Good Evening Everyone,
I have been silent off the metaphorical internet "air waves" for about two years. I am hoping to make a come back within the coming weeks. I was finishing up my degree and life got too busy with work to post good work.
I am currently figuring out to what extent I will be posting again and laying down the groundwork to come out with content more consistently.
Thank you.
Tuesday, April 17, 2018
Saturday, May 23, 2015
Looking forward to Red Bull
I know we all rejoiced when Pfeffer netted that goal, but I kinda didn't want to win. The #SackSak movement was picking up steam, and all of a sudden, no one is talking about it. Partially though, I think it's because a lot of fans, myself included, don't see a light at the end of the tunnel. Sakiewicz is a partial owner which means rooting him from his spot on the board of directors is going to be EXTREMELY difficult. I don't know about the rest of you Union fans, but I took all of the statements that Sakiewicz released on Sunday and Monday as him saying "f*** you Union fans, there is nothing you can do." I only say this because he said the same crap as he has said over and over again, and it felt more like an effort to appease the national media, local media, and the fan base than anything else.
So now, let me justify my line up:
Marquez & White because.... well, whose else can you have out there? Mo is suspended, Vitoria is injured.
Nogueira & Pfeffer because Curtin wants offensive production out of this position. Meanwhile, Nogueira prefers to sit deeper, and with Pfeffer being more of an attacking mid-fielder can provide production without sacrificing defensive cover.
Casey because he has generally played well against NYRB, and neither Sapong nor Aristeguieta has been in training extensively this week. Although, I would expect him to be subbed sometime between halftime to the 60th minute mark.
Fabinho(Wenger)-Maidana-Le Toux: We all know that Fabinho does better when he doesn't have to play defense. Maidana so he can Maidana things. Le Toux because he tends to stay more on the wing when Casey is on the field, and because he is about to turn a corner, in terms of form(that's what my gut says). However, I think Curtin will put Wenger a LW simply because he believes that Wenger can break his slump and start being effective. (Don't get me wrong, if Wenger does break this slump, it will take Union to a new level because at least offensively, Union are doing 11 men's work with 10).
The LB and RB sport: If you can start Williams at LB, and Gaddis at RB because Gaddis can give it a go, do it! However, if Gaddis can't go, move Williams to RB, and move Lee to the LB spot. My reasoning for putting Lee out there over Fabinho is because if I wanna see someone get burned, I would rather see a young kid out there who has room to improve vs. Fabinho who really does not). Again, I don't think Curtin shares this sentiment.
I personally would satisfied with a draw at NYRB(expecting based on merit that is being optimistic, but if you don't have hope, who do you have?).
Alright so... the task at hand, PHI @ NYRB
NYRB remind me a lot of Sporting KC in terms of how they go about business: it's high pressure, quasi-SKC when from two years ago. Obviously, I think SKC was a more complete team than NYRB is, but I think we should expect the Union to try to play defense, give up most of the possession, and rely on the counter.
Suggested starting line up (4-2-3-1): Williams(Lee or Fabinho)-Marquez-White-Gaddis(Williams); Nogueira-Pfeffer;Fabinho(Wenger)-Maidana-Le Toux;Casey
Primary starter(secondary starter depending how injuries play out).
Suggested starting line up (4-2-3-1): Williams(Lee or Fabinho)-Marquez-White-Gaddis(Williams); Nogueira-Pfeffer;Fabinho(Wenger)-Maidana-Le Toux;Casey
Primary starter(secondary starter depending how injuries play out).
So now, let me justify my line up:
Marquez & White because.... well, whose else can you have out there? Mo is suspended, Vitoria is injured.
Nogueira & Pfeffer because Curtin wants offensive production out of this position. Meanwhile, Nogueira prefers to sit deeper, and with Pfeffer being more of an attacking mid-fielder can provide production without sacrificing defensive cover.
Casey because he has generally played well against NYRB, and neither Sapong nor Aristeguieta has been in training extensively this week. Although, I would expect him to be subbed sometime between halftime to the 60th minute mark.
Fabinho(Wenger)-Maidana-Le Toux: We all know that Fabinho does better when he doesn't have to play defense. Maidana so he can Maidana things. Le Toux because he tends to stay more on the wing when Casey is on the field, and because he is about to turn a corner, in terms of form(that's what my gut says). However, I think Curtin will put Wenger a LW simply because he believes that Wenger can break his slump and start being effective. (Don't get me wrong, if Wenger does break this slump, it will take Union to a new level because at least offensively, Union are doing 11 men's work with 10).
The LB and RB sport: If you can start Williams at LB, and Gaddis at RB because Gaddis can give it a go, do it! However, if Gaddis can't go, move Williams to RB, and move Lee to the LB spot. My reasoning for putting Lee out there over Fabinho is because if I wanna see someone get burned, I would rather see a young kid out there who has room to improve vs. Fabinho who really does not). Again, I don't think Curtin shares this sentiment.
I personally would satisfied with a draw at NYRB(expecting based on merit that is being optimistic, but if you don't have hope, who do you have?).
Sunday, May 17, 2015
Status of Continental Club Soccer in North America
Like millions of other soccer fans, I am a big fan of the UEFA Champions League and the UEFA Europa League.The passion3, the buzz, and the quality of play is so much fun to watch that it is hard for me not be mesmerized. Which beckons the question, why is the CONCACAF Champions League(CCL) not only not on the same level but light years behind its European cousin?
First off, like most things in the real world, where is the money? From my latest reading, there is no significant prize money. You get prize money for qualifying for the FIFA Club World Cup, which is about $0.5 million from my readings, but there is no direct prize money from CONCACAF for winning the tournament. So, to make CONCACAF Champions League competitive, there needs to be some form of incentive for the teams to put forth their best effort. Just to clarify, by best effort, I mean best players playing, adding more depth, and making CCL a priority. The only CONCACAF can do this is through successful branding. And the good thing is that there is certainly potential for it. I believe I read @thegoalkeeper on twitter say that more than 500k tuned into the first leg of the CONCACAF Champions League final for the first leg on Unimas; I'm not sure about the second leg, that fell during my finals week, so I was completely unaware of anything that happened(outside of the result). In addition, you have to look at the gate sales for both the legs of the CONCACAF Champions league, both at Estadio Azteca and Stadium Olympic. Both of which were sold out with a total sum of more than 160k+ in attendance. If done properly, the CCL could become the premier spectacle of North American club soccer.
Secondly, when you think of CONCACAF in general, a lot of bad things come to mind. Bad officiating, racist fans, body fluids being thrown at players, and etc. CONCACAF needs to a better job of eliminating these incidents from the CCL. I know that it will be a difficult to eradicate completely, but the measures that CONCACAF has taken is definitely not up to par. For CCL to take a step up in the food chain of continental soccer, it needs to get rid of the unnecessary idiotic-ness in the competition.
A lot of soccer fans can recall Montreal's latest run to the CCL finals, and everybody began talking about how this would make a statement for the league and how far it has come. I mean, how far has it come really? Outside of the emergence of big-market, deep-pocketed teams like LA, Seattle, NYC, and Toronto, most owners are still very parsimonious with their acquisitions, and most marque-players coming over still past 32 years of age(what I consider to be the last year of their physical prime). I was rooting for Montreal like all MLS fans were, but I was heartbroken on cheering for them because of one key issue. And I'll break it down to three key parts:
a) Montreal wins the CCL, and all the other MLS teams snub it,and say something like, "look, this competition is so diluted that the team that was at the bottom of the table last year in MLS became continental champions." And they conti
b) Montreal wins the CCL and all other MLS teams become envious of the shiny new trophies in their cabinet and begin putting in resources to winning CCL in addition to their ongoing pursuits.
c) Montreal loses the CCL final. This once again shows the gap, a growing one if I may add, between MLS to Liga MX. MLS clubs decide to actively close this gap, and more money is put into improving the quality of play. Salary Cap is dramatically increased for the 2015 season up to about $5 million, and the salary cap increases aggressively with respect to 2015 cap.
d) MLS continues this slow and painful rise as a trot out players that say the same crap over and over again of it being a 'growing league' in which 'the quality improves every year.' Meanwhile, the league continues to bring in guys that are well past their prime, many of whom cannot take the physical tolls of league play, domestic cups, and CCL. I am not talking about the mid-tier DPs like Nigel Reo-Coker, but the high-end DPs such as Thierry Henry, Robbie Keane, and David Beckham. Guys who either by their choice or the choice of their coach, did not play in the CCL.
Secondly, when you think of CONCACAF in general, a lot of bad things come to mind. Bad officiating, racist fans, body fluids being thrown at players, and etc. CONCACAF needs to a better job of eliminating these incidents from the CCL. I know that it will be a difficult to eradicate completely, but the measures that CONCACAF has taken is definitely not up to par. For CCL to take a step up in the food chain of continental soccer, it needs to get rid of the unnecessary idiotic-ness in the competition.
A lot of soccer fans can recall Montreal's latest run to the CCL finals, and everybody began talking about how this would make a statement for the league and how far it has come. I mean, how far has it come really? Outside of the emergence of big-market, deep-pocketed teams like LA, Seattle, NYC, and Toronto, most owners are still very parsimonious with their acquisitions, and most marque-players coming over still past 32 years of age(what I consider to be the last year of their physical prime). I was rooting for Montreal like all MLS fans were, but I was heartbroken on cheering for them because of one key issue. And I'll break it down to three key parts:
a) Montreal wins the CCL, and all the other MLS teams snub it,and say something like, "look, this competition is so diluted that the team that was at the bottom of the table last year in MLS became continental champions." And they conti
b) Montreal wins the CCL and all other MLS teams become envious of the shiny new trophies in their cabinet and begin putting in resources to winning CCL in addition to their ongoing pursuits.
c) Montreal loses the CCL final. This once again shows the gap, a growing one if I may add, between MLS to Liga MX. MLS clubs decide to actively close this gap, and more money is put into improving the quality of play. Salary Cap is dramatically increased for the 2015 season up to about $5 million, and the salary cap increases aggressively with respect to 2015 cap.
d) MLS continues this slow and painful rise as a trot out players that say the same crap over and over again of it being a 'growing league' in which 'the quality improves every year.' Meanwhile, the league continues to bring in guys that are well past their prime, many of whom cannot take the physical tolls of league play, domestic cups, and CCL. I am not talking about the mid-tier DPs like Nigel Reo-Coker, but the high-end DPs such as Thierry Henry, Robbie Keane, and David Beckham. Guys who either by their choice or the choice of their coach, did not play in the CCL.
Wednesday, May 6, 2015
An Open Letter to Jay Sugarman
Mr. Sugarman,
After last weekend's game, I saw a photo of a Union fan who was at the Toronto FC at Philadelphia Union game who had painted a phrase that said something like "It's either Nick Sakiewicz or the fans.... Your Pick Sugarman." That is a super bold statement, and one that I frankly agree with. Think about the successful companies not only in sports, but in the world. When have you ever heard of a company where the consumers want their CEO gone? How come we don't see Tesla Motors customers asking for Elon Musk to be fired? Why don't we see people asking for Tim Cook to go? Why aren't Philadelphians asking for Don Smolenski to be fired? The answer is simple. Those CEO have not under performed nearly as much as the CEO of the Philadelphia Union.
Allow me to use my two semesters of Economics to describe my frustration in a manner that I hope will resonate with you. You can talk about wanting soccer to grow as much as you want; however, as a businessman, you brought an MLS team to Philadelphia because you saw the demand for it. You realized that this was an opportunity for you to make a good profit. However, I don't know how you aren't fed up with the underwhelming performance of your CEO. The last time there was any real buzz around this team was 4 years ago, in 2011, and that is simply unsatisfying, especially in the results-driven, what-have-you-done-for-me recently industry of sports. Now, let's back track to the economics of you bringing this team to Philadelphia. Everyone knew of the potential success this team could have. You had a rapidly growing supporters group in the Sons of Ben, you were in the 4th largest media market in the United States, and soccer is a fast growing sport in this country; you had the formula for success before you made the announcement at City Hall. Now, more than five years after the first ball was kicked, Philadelphia Union is not one of the most competitive teams in the league. Instead, your CEO has driven fan morale in the ground, and has people threatening to boycott games instead of you having sellouts game in and game out. If you think that the reason for the team's poor performance is because of the manager, I would like you to think about whose job it was to hire this manager, the failed manager before that, and the failed one before that. Just to wrap things up, you had a demand ready-made and you had the supply. All you needed your CEO to do was not mess up the supply on the field so much that your demand erodes; the fact that you have let Mr. Nick Sakiewicz mess it up this much is way beyond my levels of understanding and comprehension.
Don't misunderstand me here, Mr. Sugarman, I don't expect this team go out and spend millions like Toronto, Seattle, Los Angeles, and Orlando City do. However, with more and more money being put into this league, if you realistically expect your team to be competitive, your organization needs to run like a well oiled machine that is firing on all cylinders; not a rusty old Buick that has as shredded timing belt. So far, I have spoken to two people who have interned at professional sports teams, and I have heard of two varying responses. One of them, who worked at a minor league baseball team, could not have been happier with the organization and how it was run; on the other hand, I had a friend who interned for Union, and he was shocked by the disarray and the poor management of the organization. You are getting outclassed by a minor league team here Mr. Sugarman. The best advice my father ever game was "You are as good as the standard you hold yourself to; if things aren't going well, hold yourself to a higher standard." So, with my final remark, I ask you Mr. Sugarman, when will you start to hold yourself and your CEO to a higher standard?
Very Respectfully,
Rutvij K. Dave
After last weekend's game, I saw a photo of a Union fan who was at the Toronto FC at Philadelphia Union game who had painted a phrase that said something like "It's either Nick Sakiewicz or the fans.... Your Pick Sugarman." That is a super bold statement, and one that I frankly agree with. Think about the successful companies not only in sports, but in the world. When have you ever heard of a company where the consumers want their CEO gone? How come we don't see Tesla Motors customers asking for Elon Musk to be fired? Why don't we see people asking for Tim Cook to go? Why aren't Philadelphians asking for Don Smolenski to be fired? The answer is simple. Those CEO have not under performed nearly as much as the CEO of the Philadelphia Union.
Allow me to use my two semesters of Economics to describe my frustration in a manner that I hope will resonate with you. You can talk about wanting soccer to grow as much as you want; however, as a businessman, you brought an MLS team to Philadelphia because you saw the demand for it. You realized that this was an opportunity for you to make a good profit. However, I don't know how you aren't fed up with the underwhelming performance of your CEO. The last time there was any real buzz around this team was 4 years ago, in 2011, and that is simply unsatisfying, especially in the results-driven, what-have-you-done-for-me recently industry of sports. Now, let's back track to the economics of you bringing this team to Philadelphia. Everyone knew of the potential success this team could have. You had a rapidly growing supporters group in the Sons of Ben, you were in the 4th largest media market in the United States, and soccer is a fast growing sport in this country; you had the formula for success before you made the announcement at City Hall. Now, more than five years after the first ball was kicked, Philadelphia Union is not one of the most competitive teams in the league. Instead, your CEO has driven fan morale in the ground, and has people threatening to boycott games instead of you having sellouts game in and game out. If you think that the reason for the team's poor performance is because of the manager, I would like you to think about whose job it was to hire this manager, the failed manager before that, and the failed one before that. Just to wrap things up, you had a demand ready-made and you had the supply. All you needed your CEO to do was not mess up the supply on the field so much that your demand erodes; the fact that you have let Mr. Nick Sakiewicz mess it up this much is way beyond my levels of understanding and comprehension.
Don't misunderstand me here, Mr. Sugarman, I don't expect this team go out and spend millions like Toronto, Seattle, Los Angeles, and Orlando City do. However, with more and more money being put into this league, if you realistically expect your team to be competitive, your organization needs to run like a well oiled machine that is firing on all cylinders; not a rusty old Buick that has as shredded timing belt. So far, I have spoken to two people who have interned at professional sports teams, and I have heard of two varying responses. One of them, who worked at a minor league baseball team, could not have been happier with the organization and how it was run; on the other hand, I had a friend who interned for Union, and he was shocked by the disarray and the poor management of the organization. You are getting outclassed by a minor league team here Mr. Sugarman. The best advice my father ever game was "You are as good as the standard you hold yourself to; if things aren't going well, hold yourself to a higher standard." So, with my final remark, I ask you Mr. Sugarman, when will you start to hold yourself and your CEO to a higher standard?
Very Respectfully,
Rutvij K. Dave
Wednesday, April 29, 2015
...... So Now What?
So.... Now what? Union lose at Columbus 4-1 and show what happens when you have problems at the very top of your organization, with Sakiewicz. Someone who I think gravely under qualified to run a sports team. In fact, if Red Bull didn't come in to buy the Metrostars in 2007(I think that was the year), he would not be screwing up our team.
I believe most of you know that I want a change in the FO. But I'll write about how the team can throw some bandages on this team and hopefully get a patch-job until the summer transfer window opens and we can do some actual things. Assuming Sakiewicz realizes that he needs to buy a coupple players this summer. You know, guys that won't blow chunks (aka Carlos Valdes and Rais M'bolhi) and will step up. So this is what you do.
1 - Get a proper starting XI
There has been way too much shuffling around with the Starting XI for us to win. I know guys were/are injured and Pfeffer getting called up the U20s didn't help. But, get a proper starting eleven. And choose youth over experience you're in doubt. This is what I mean, if I have to choose between Pfeffer and Carroll for DM spot, I choose Pfeffer because if I were to see either person mess up, I would be able to justify Pfeffer because he's young, and can/will learn from it. Another example, instead of throwing Fabinho out there last week, I would have rather seen Raymond Lee. Yeah, I know that Lee was a big part in the two late goals vs. SKC, but I would rather have youth mess rather than my older guys. Especially when you know that youth players are physically gifted.(Lee is the second fastest player on Union behind Gaddis). Also, put Le Toux on the bench. I like the guy, but he has done nothing through 9 games to show that he has deserves to play 84 minutes per game. Put Ayuk in, at the very least, he gives you energy and has given you more offensive production than Le Toux + Wenger. Also, that'll send a message throughout the locker room for all the guys to wake the hell up because you are benching the most successful player in franchise history.
In my opinion, this is what you go with vs Toronto. 4-2-3-1. I know, no real surprises there. (Lee(Gaddis)-Vitoria(White)-Edu-Gaddis(Williams);Lahoud-Pfeffer;Sapong-Maidana-Ayuk;Casey). With the subs, I say you bring on McLaughlin for Ayuk, Nogueira for Lahoud, and Aristeguieta or Catic for Casey). I don't think Nando will be be physically fit enough to go a full 90 after missing the last game. I've seen which guys are willing to do what it takes to win and put the blood, sweat and tears in. I'm not saying that the others guys don't work hard; all I'm saying is that its time for the guys who look disinterested or aren't performing well to ride the pine.
2 - Raise Hell
Go watch the "MLS 36: Matt Besler and Aurelien Collin" and go to the 19:57 mark where Peter Vermes is addressing the guys at half time. I don't know if Curtin is doing this; I don't think he is because he is a guy who wants to talk things with guys. Raise hell Curtin, call guys out. Get in their face, throw some chairs. Let them know who is boss. It's not your job to be their friend, it's your job to get every drop of success out of the players as you can. I think to an extent, great coaches demand a healthy fear from their players. Do you think Greg Popovich says you know what Tony, You need to do better? No! He gets in his face, goes all drill sergeant on his guys and gets them to get their crap straight. I'm not saying be the next Peter Nowak and deprive your players of water during practice, but your job is not to be their friend, but their coach. Also, show some emotions on the sidelines; every game, the camera points to you and have this stoic look on your face. You're not modeling man, get in fourth officials face, make things happen
This is what I meant by allowing Jim Curtin to grow as a manager in my previous post. He needs to learn these things and I think he will, because if not anything else, I think the man cares for this team and the fans.
3 - Transfers
First things first, clear the cap space by getting of Rais M'bolhi and hope some European team picks up Carlos Valdes from Nacional. I don't know if Nick Sakiewicz knows, but Rais played in a league called MLS, and he stunk it up so bad that he was replaced by a kid in the North American 3rd division.
Union Transfers tweeted the Erik Hurtado is on the trading block, and they could really use a guy like that. He is fast, has a left foot(something Union need really bad right now), and can provide some very much needed depth to the roster, especially in mid-field. Try to get a left-footed LB and a proper Defensive mid-fielder. I would keep Edu at the CB spot and have him continue to learn that position because if he wants a shot back on the USMNT, it will have to be at CB because US is too deep in box-to-box mids. And, without a question, Edu is the best athlete on the roster.
Also, if you can trade/sell either Gaddis or Williams at the end of the season, I would do it. I would keep Gaddis because he has a higher ceiling and I think they are about equally good. Regardless, if you should offload one, simply because you don't want to block up too much of your salary cap with LB/RBs. Maybe look to get a young RB(maybe Generation Adidas player) in the draft.
4 - Patience
I might sound crazy, but I have blind faith in Jim Curtin. I like the guy. Is he perfect? No. But he is a young head coach that still a lot to learn and has probably been thrown into the fire a bit too early. However, I think we as fans should bare the storm(I know I hate saying this). Allow the team to learn to be better. It is just not good for the development of our players to have such inconsistency at the manager position. Do we really want to be the next TFC(not financially, but successfully) of the MLS? Nope! Patience man, give the coach time to right this ship!
Wednesday, April 22, 2015
The Current State of the Philadelphia Union
If you came here looking for my criticism of the Philadelphia Union's loss to the New England Revolution, you can go ahead read my post from two weeks ago about the loss to SKC and switch out the team names because my feeling is about the same. I do want to write about the state of the Union as a team, and as an organization.
Now it's no surprise that people want Jim Curtin fired because of the team's performance over the last few weeks. The thing I don't understand is.... Why? Let's say that the claim is 100% justified and that Curtin is let go. What do you think the front office will do? Pry Arsene Wenger out of the hands of Arsenal by paying him $8 million vs. the $6.8 he makes right now? Nope. The Union will try to offer the job to anyone who is remotely qualified and is willing work for under $70k(guestimated number). That is a near certainity. After Curtin's strong run last summer, he was able to negotiate his salary up to $104k(read on wikipedia). That is the mantra of Nick Sakiewicz. Since his days at the Metro-Stars, he has been very parsimonious when it comes to expenditures, and I get that the Union are not owned by a big conglomerate and that we're a team that we will have to be the Eibar to the FC Barcelona of the Seattle Sounders and LA Galaxy in MLS. For this to work, Sak must make smart and calculated decisions with personnel, especially players: a thing for which he has no track record. If not, the Union will fall further behind in an increasingly competitive Major League Soccer. Sak has no proper experience in either playing or successfully operating a soccer team. I can count his professional appearances with one hand.(Which is two professional appearances) Do you remember the chant that the Sons of Ben do every time the Red Bulls roll into town "(19) years.... no cup!" Do you know who was in charge of that team up until it was sold to Red Bull? That is right, our best friend Nick Sakiewicz. I'm not saying he's a bad guy, but his best position on the Board of Directors should be deciding which shade of Navy Blue the Union jerseys be.(To which he will choose the cheapest one) We can only pray that Jeffrey Lurie comes banging on the doors of PPL Park with a check for $180 million, which is exactly twice what the Union were worth in 2013 according to Forbes magazine. Or we can hope that Sak comes to his senses and hires a general manager. I would be fine with either to be honest. I think the fan base is right in calling for the Board to hire a General Manager because I haven't seen any real fruits of the Renee Meulensteen experiment.
I would like to make this clear, it's clear that Sackiewicz is a fan of soccer; he has great passion and interest in it. However, his expertise lies more in the business side of the team(marketing, advertising, and making sure the team is avoiding red tape). His performance indicates that he is not good at the human resource management aspect of the team, aka the numerous failed acquisitions (Valdes, M'bolhi, and Adu). Although, you have to give him credit for bringing Maurice Edu in, who I think has been the best signing for this franchise by far.
Now you are wondering what can you do? Well, not much. Of course you can try to organize a boycott and force the Union FO to make changes, but that is really difficult. I believe that the sleeping giant in this story are our favorite supporters group, the Sons of Ben. I remember hearing the quote "you will really see the Sons of Ben flexing their muscle here and showing what they can do" in an interview once, and I think they could force changes. Either by going straight to the board of directors and demanding changes, or by organizing an ownership group change by asking a bunch of wealthy Philadelphians(just my personal preference) who would be willing to make this team competitive to invest in this club. I know it sounds a little far-fetched, but hey so did an MLS club in Philadelphia ten years ago.
Now, about this whole Jim Curtin issue. I know what everybody is thinking, Curtin clearly looks out of sorts. He doesn't know what he is doing. Well, no freaking crap. Did you expect him to turn around this team in a span of one year and learn how to be a manager? No, that's way to steep of a demand for a guy that has no real experience in being a manager. All I'm saying is that we finally have a no non-sense guy who understands what we go through as fans. Let's not throw this away be demanding a change every two years. Do we really wanna be known as the Toronto FC of the United States? The thing I have to criticize us Philadelphians for is our lack of patience every time we deal with youth and inexperience, we demand results right away. We don't do well with growing pains. We flipped s*** at Todd Bowles because he didn't perform as the Eagles D-Coordinator. What did he do? Go to the Cardinals, perform well in Arizona and now he has a head coaching job. Look, all I'm saying is that you have a guy who knows what Philadelphia fans are about, and understands the trouble of being a fan in this town. Allow him to learn how to do his job, this team won't turn into the next dominant MLS franchise over night, but allow him to do his thing and develop as a manger, let him make mistakes and criticize him at times when he does so just so he knows that we're holding him accountable. Another NFL reference, Mike McCarthy was 8-8 his first season as a head coach in the NFL, but ultimately won the Superbowl, and it took Einstein 10 years to perfect his theory or relatively. And Ben Olson won just three games two years with DC United but took the team to the playoffs last year and to back-to-back Champions League appearances. We have potential, at least as far as the manager position is concerned, let's not allow our patented impatience get in the way of success.
Other than that, I hope the Union can pull off a tie against Columbus this Saturday. DOOP!
Now it's no surprise that people want Jim Curtin fired because of the team's performance over the last few weeks. The thing I don't understand is.... Why? Let's say that the claim is 100% justified and that Curtin is let go. What do you think the front office will do? Pry Arsene Wenger out of the hands of Arsenal by paying him $8 million vs. the $6.8 he makes right now? Nope. The Union will try to offer the job to anyone who is remotely qualified and is willing work for under $70k(guestimated number). That is a near certainity. After Curtin's strong run last summer, he was able to negotiate his salary up to $104k(read on wikipedia). That is the mantra of Nick Sakiewicz. Since his days at the Metro-Stars, he has been very parsimonious when it comes to expenditures, and I get that the Union are not owned by a big conglomerate and that we're a team that we will have to be the Eibar to the FC Barcelona of the Seattle Sounders and LA Galaxy in MLS. For this to work, Sak must make smart and calculated decisions with personnel, especially players: a thing for which he has no track record. If not, the Union will fall further behind in an increasingly competitive Major League Soccer. Sak has no proper experience in either playing or successfully operating a soccer team. I can count his professional appearances with one hand.(Which is two professional appearances) Do you remember the chant that the Sons of Ben do every time the Red Bulls roll into town "(19) years.... no cup!" Do you know who was in charge of that team up until it was sold to Red Bull? That is right, our best friend Nick Sakiewicz. I'm not saying he's a bad guy, but his best position on the Board of Directors should be deciding which shade of Navy Blue the Union jerseys be.(To which he will choose the cheapest one) We can only pray that Jeffrey Lurie comes banging on the doors of PPL Park with a check for $180 million, which is exactly twice what the Union were worth in 2013 according to Forbes magazine. Or we can hope that Sak comes to his senses and hires a general manager. I would be fine with either to be honest. I think the fan base is right in calling for the Board to hire a General Manager because I haven't seen any real fruits of the Renee Meulensteen experiment.
I would like to make this clear, it's clear that Sackiewicz is a fan of soccer; he has great passion and interest in it. However, his expertise lies more in the business side of the team(marketing, advertising, and making sure the team is avoiding red tape). His performance indicates that he is not good at the human resource management aspect of the team, aka the numerous failed acquisitions (Valdes, M'bolhi, and Adu). Although, you have to give him credit for bringing Maurice Edu in, who I think has been the best signing for this franchise by far.
Now you are wondering what can you do? Well, not much. Of course you can try to organize a boycott and force the Union FO to make changes, but that is really difficult. I believe that the sleeping giant in this story are our favorite supporters group, the Sons of Ben. I remember hearing the quote "you will really see the Sons of Ben flexing their muscle here and showing what they can do" in an interview once, and I think they could force changes. Either by going straight to the board of directors and demanding changes, or by organizing an ownership group change by asking a bunch of wealthy Philadelphians(just my personal preference) who would be willing to make this team competitive to invest in this club. I know it sounds a little far-fetched, but hey so did an MLS club in Philadelphia ten years ago.
Now, about this whole Jim Curtin issue. I know what everybody is thinking, Curtin clearly looks out of sorts. He doesn't know what he is doing. Well, no freaking crap. Did you expect him to turn around this team in a span of one year and learn how to be a manager? No, that's way to steep of a demand for a guy that has no real experience in being a manager. All I'm saying is that we finally have a no non-sense guy who understands what we go through as fans. Let's not throw this away be demanding a change every two years. Do we really wanna be known as the Toronto FC of the United States? The thing I have to criticize us Philadelphians for is our lack of patience every time we deal with youth and inexperience, we demand results right away. We don't do well with growing pains. We flipped s*** at Todd Bowles because he didn't perform as the Eagles D-Coordinator. What did he do? Go to the Cardinals, perform well in Arizona and now he has a head coaching job. Look, all I'm saying is that you have a guy who knows what Philadelphia fans are about, and understands the trouble of being a fan in this town. Allow him to learn how to do his job, this team won't turn into the next dominant MLS franchise over night, but allow him to do his thing and develop as a manger, let him make mistakes and criticize him at times when he does so just so he knows that we're holding him accountable. Another NFL reference, Mike McCarthy was 8-8 his first season as a head coach in the NFL, but ultimately won the Superbowl, and it took Einstein 10 years to perfect his theory or relatively. And Ben Olson won just three games two years with DC United but took the team to the playoffs last year and to back-to-back Champions League appearances. We have potential, at least as far as the manager position is concerned, let's not allow our patented impatience get in the way of success.
Other than that, I hope the Union can pull off a tie against Columbus this Saturday. DOOP!
Thursday, April 16, 2015
Thoughts Philadelphia Union 1 - 1 NYCFC
I'm in the middle of an exam week so I'll have to make this quick. I was just gonna skip, but I wanna make a commitment to doing these after every game.
First off, I wanna make a correction from my last post, I went back and looked at the game from last week, and Ayuk is pretty good at the combination play(as Jim Curtin pointed out during the presser). So, my apologizes for that.
So, here it is. Post match reactions:
First off, I wanna make a correction from my last post, I went back and looked at the game from last week, and Ayuk is pretty good at the combination play(as Jim Curtin pointed out during the presser). So, my apologizes for that.
So, here it is. Post match reactions:
The good
-Backline was solid once again. Especially Vitoria and Edu. They still struggle against combination play, but that'll get better with time and continuity.
-Curtin's subs were good for a second game in a row. Maidana, Pfeffer, and Sapong clearly made a difference. Hope Noguiera isn't injured too bad(And now that we're not gonna see them for a few months, I hope the same for David Villa). I mean, I would have been kind of sad if Villa hurt himself really bad. But let's on Saturday he tweaked his hamstring a little would have to be out for a week maximum, I would not have felt too bad for Man City B.... I mean, NYCFC, I don't know why I keep messing up like that.
-Nando continues to impress me with his guts and effort. I wanted one of his long range shots to go in simple because as Philly fans we normally don't see them and it would have a goal nonetheless.
-Ayuk really freaking fun to watch.
-Just because we have seen how bad a team can play without this, I'll put camaraderie on here. It was awesome to see Sheanon Williams push Grabavoy back after that one play. I saw(and I could be wrong) that Grabavoy was mad because Ayuk wrongfully pushed Villa out of bounds(which he didn't, he clearly had the better positioning).
The bad
-Lack of possession will hurt us(41%-59%). We could have the same back four as AC Milan, but if we continue to lose the possession battle as bad as we do, we're eventually going to get burned.
-Wenger just seems out of sorts. I would like to see Pfeffer start in his spot next game just to light a fire under Wenger's butt. Also, as much running as Le Toux does, I still wanna see him get on the score sheet. I know he's going through a slump right now but Jamison Olave has more goals for Philadelphia than Le Toux does seven games in.
-Teams are going to game plan for Ayuk, and he will need to add layers to his game and continue to develop to be as effective as he has been(which makes sense for a guy that's really young).
Sunday:
-I think the Union will push and press to get a goal, maybe two if they're lucky in the first(maybe 60 minutes) if possible but they will run out of gas because 3 games in 8 days is a very tough ask. In terms of the line-up, I have no idea. We're still not 100% fit, so I can't even predict what will happen.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)